According to an independent poll of 200 charitable organizations, overall donations of money to nonprofit groups increased last year, but educational institutions did not fare as well as other organizations. Donations to international aid groups increased the most (30 percent), followed by donations to environmental groups (23 percent), whereas donations to educational institutions actually decreased slightly (3 percent). Meanwhile, all of the major economic indicators suggest that consumer spending is higher than average this year, showing that potential donors have ample disposable income. Therefore, the clearest explanation for the decline in donations to educational institutions is that people actually value education less than they did in the past.

Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.

In the passage, the author attributes the decline in donations to educational institutions to the fact that people do not value education as much as they used to. While this might be the case, we cannot simply ignore other explanations which could rival the proposed one endorsed by the author.

First, we need to determine whether the receipt of donations is a major source of income for educational institutions. In many places, it is the public sector that matters, and the private sector is a small part of the local education system. Therefore, local educational institutions may primarily receive financial support from the government and do not need sponsorship from other organizations. In addition, for a country or city, the level of education development can significantly influence the future development of the local area in the long run, because good education can help to retain talented people, attract more talents, and thus promote the future development of the city. Therefore, more and more governments are taking the initiative to take responsibility for developing education. So it is possible that the government's support for local educational institutions is increasing, which leads to a decrease in private or philanthropic donations to educational institutions.

Secondly, the development of educational institutions will also determine whether they receive more external funding. As competition in society increases, both parents and students hope to gain a competitive edge in the future by obtaining a better education. The increased emphasis on education in society will further promote the development of the education industry. More people choose to further their education in educational institutions, bringing more income to the educational institutions. This factor will partly explain the decrease in donations to educational institutions. Since their earning capacity is high, they do not need to accept outside contributions. In addition, with the increased emphasis on education in society, educational institutions do not need to promote enrollment through mass marketing as they used to do before, and now students will come to them for advice. In this way, the large amount of money saved on marketing also eliminates the need for educational institutions to accept donations from charitable organizations. Also, the business model of the educational institution is an alternative explanation about why donations decrease. For example, educational institutions can earn higher profits by raising their prices or replacing large labor costs through new technology. With higher profits, there is no need for educational institutions to receive donations from charities.

Third, to explain the decrease in donations received by educational institutions, we also need to consider the charities themselves. It is possible that the charity's funding priorities may have been adjusted differently over time. For example, in previous years, the local education sector was booming, but the government was spending its money elsewhere, so education institutions had to rely on charities. However, as society changes, charities began to allocate money to other areas, which led to reduced donations to educational institutions.

Finally, we need to consider the impact of private sponsorship on the donations received by educational institutions. The author of the article mentions a number of economic indicators that show that consumers are spending more on average than in previous years, but does not mention information on consumer income. It is very likely that due to local inflation, prices have risen, resulting in higher consumer spending, but consumer income has not changed. Therefore, less money is available for private donations. If this is the case, the decrease in donations received by educational institutions can also be attributed to economic development and the economic situation of consumers themselves.

In conclusion, the reasons behind the decrease in the amount of donations received by educational institutions need more consideration, and the above alternative explanations may also explain the facts presented by the authors.

7 次查看



The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist. "Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that

A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical

The following was written as a part of an application for a small-business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe. "A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterpri